When three carrier quotes come back, the instinct is to sort by premium and present the cheapest option. Most clients ask for the cheapest option. But the cheapest quote and the best quote are often not the same — and the difference matters at claim time. Tower CRM's built-in rater scores all four factors automatically and surfaces the real winner.

Why price-only comparison fails clients

Consider two auto quotes:

  • Carrier A: $900/year, $1,000 deductible, $100K/$300K liability, AM Best A+
  • Carrier B: $750/year, $2,500 deductible, $50K/$100K liability, AM Best B+

Carrier B is $150/year cheaper. Most price-only tools surface it first. But the client is taking on $1,500 more in out-of-pocket deductible exposure, half the liability coverage, and a carrier with lower financial strength — for $12.50 less per month.

A well-advised client usually chooses Carrier A. The problem is that making that case requires comparing four dimensions simultaneously, which most agents do manually in a spreadsheet or by reading quotes side by side on separate screens.

How Tower’s rater works

Tower’s multi-factor quote rater is built into every deal record. When carrier quotes come back, log each one with:

  • Premium — annual or monthly cost
  • Deductible — client out-of-pocket before coverage applies
  • Liability limit — coverage ceiling
  • AM Best rating — carrier financial strength (A++ down to NR)

The rater scores each quote across all four factors using weighted scoring:

Factor Weight Logic
Premium 40% Lower is better, normalized within the quote set
Deductible 25% Lower is better
Liability limit 20% Higher is better
AM Best rating 15% A++ through NR mapped to a strength score

The composite score — 0 to 100 — reflects the best overall combination, not just the cheapest price. Quotes are sorted automatically with the winner at the top. Each column highlights the best-in-class cell so you can see where each carrier wins and loses at a glance.

The weighting mirrors how experienced agents already think about quotes. Premium matters most, but a $1,500 deductible difference or a B-rated carrier can override a $200 premium advantage. The rater makes that judgment systematic rather than intuitive.

What this replaces

The standalone rater market — Turborater, PL Rating, EZLynx’s comparative rater — exists because most CRMs and AMS platforms don’t have quote comparison built in. Those tools start at $50–$150/month and live outside your client record, which means copying results back manually.

Tower’s rater is built into the deal. Quote results live on the same record as the client, the policy dates, and the renewal reminders — no separate subscription, no manual transfer.

The client conversation

The rater output also changes how you present options to clients. Instead of saying “here are three prices,” you can walk through a ranked comparison with a clear explanation of why the top-scoring quote wins on balance. That conversation is easier to have when the data is already organized.

For agents building a book on referrals, the quality of that recommendation — and the outcome when a client actually files a claim — is what drives retention and word of mouth.

Setup

Quote comparison is active on every deal in insurance mode. Open a deal, go to the Quotes section, add carrier quotes with their key terms, and the rater scores and ranks them in real time. No templates to configure, no formulas to build.

📋

Free Download

CRM & AMS Evaluation Checklist

20 questions to ask before choosing your agency software stack — so you don't get locked into the wrong platform in year one.

Business email required · No spam

📖

Full Guide

How to Start a Scratch Insurance Agency — The Complete Year-One Guide

Everything you need to launch your first independent P&C agency: licensing, entity setup, carrier appointments, leads, dialer, CRM, and the lean tech stack.